Thursday, October 28, 2010

A Complaint Letter that should be sent a thousand times over

On a lighter note, here's an EPIC complaint letter that should have been sent a thousand times over, but alas... it didn't.
>>>
Dear MP and Town Council/HDB/NEA/Whoever has jurisdiction over the courtyard at xxx Avenue,

Have you ever gotten annoyed with that neighbour with an expensive surround sound karaoke system who decides that having his family as an audience is not enough and he HAS to air his singing for the benefit of everyone living within a 500m radius of his house?

Well, I have.

Except it's not just an innocent karaoke session at a flat where I can go up to, knock on the door, and tell the owner what I imagine Simon Cowell would say about his singing.

Here's what I want to say to the person who gave the authorization for an AMATEUR KARAOKE COMPETITION for SINGAPOREAN IDOL UNCLE WANNABES to be held at the courtyard at xxx Avenue on a Sunday night when 60% of those living in the blocks of flats surrounding the said courtyard are trying to watch the President's Star Charity on TV, 20% of whom are attempting to finish their homework or study for the upcoming 'O' or 'A' levels examinations, and 19.99% (which includes me) of whom are trying to have a restful Sunday evening before the harried rush of work in the week ahead, and only 0.01% of whom are actually attending the said event itself:

"Censored"

Did you REALLY think that a courtyard (and in case you don't know the definition of "courtyard", it means an OPEN AIR space) is a suitable venue to hold a KARAOKE competition, and not just ANY KARAOKE competition, but an AMATEUR KARAOKE COMPETITION which the organizers did NOT think it necessary to have any screening process whatsoever?

Like, REALLY?

When there's a community centre with an AUDITORIUM (and in case you don't know the definition of "auditorium", it means an ENCLOSED space, usually an air-conditioned facility) just less than 100m down the road?

Notice I DIDN'T care when you authorized 歌台s or fundraisers (which at least invited paid singers), or processions with their bands of drums, cymbals and gongs
that kept repeating their motif for 4 hours and wasn't music to my ears at all,
to be held at the said courtyard.

Notice I DIDN'T care when you authorized these events without actually monitoring them to check whether the organizers abided by the STOP ALL NOISE BY 10.30PM rule.

But I care, I CARE when the majority of those uncles at the said karaoke competition cannot even carry a tune, and one of them actually wondered why he waited for his absent lover until 花兒也榭了?

I CARE when such karaoke competitions are not held anywhere where I can at least CHOOSE not to be part of the audience. When they are made into TV programmes I can switch channels anytime or be amused by the comments of the judges;

EVEN THEN, did you know that the producers do multiple rounds of screening
and when tone-deaf people actually DO end up performing, It's actually INTENTIONAL and carries some ENTERTAINMENT VALUE?

When they are held at shopping malls I can walk out of the mall anytime, but when it's held at the said courtyard, HOW DO YOU SUPPOSE I exercise my right to choose not to be part of the intended audience?

Did you REALLY think that ALL those who sign up for karaoke competitions ACTUALLY KNOW HOW TO SING?

So I implore you to PLEASE THINK (and in case you don't know the definition of "think", I quote dictionary.com "to employ your mind rationally and objectively in evaluating or dealing with a given situation") and consider the mental well-being of all the residents in the blocks of flats surrounding the said courtyard the next time you decide whether to authorize an event to be held at the said courtyard.

Thank you.

Yours sincerely,
Very irritated and disgruntled resident

No comments: